FM: I agree with Andrea’s conclusions.

FM: In my knowledge aren’t strong experimental confirmation for that.

FM: I don’t know this model.

FM: It’s my question.

FM: It’s uneasy consider too many differences in electromagnetic properties able to justify a therapeutic specific effect in an individual situation but only with that substance in an harmonious relationship with the organism cured, also with the variables of each dilution used.

FM: If hormesis may be applied for any substance you want consider, homeopathy could have a therapy for any illness. Furthermore, the nano particles aren’t the final point, because are simply the explanation of a receptorial way of acting, but beyond the receptor there’s the real mechanism of action, different for any substance.

FM: Yes, according with the presence of nano particles.

FM: See my answer at questions 6.

FM: I think that considering D dilution we may introduce elements of confusion, because the ponderal differences are not insignificant using D or CH dilution, it means following  entirely different models.

FM: I believe that there are reasons connected with chemical properties of vehicle or recipients, but I’m not an expert in this field.